Election Rigging May Have Overturned The Election In This Huge District
Totally the safest, securest, bestest election ever...
SCRIPTURE OF THE DAY:
For the whole Law is fulfilled in one word, in the statement, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.”
- Galatians 5:14 NASB95
TODAY’S SUBSTACK:
PRIMARY ELECTION OVERTURNED DUE TO VIDEO EVIDENCE OF POTENTIAL BALLOT STUFFING
*footnotes can be found at the bottom of the post
Bridgeport, Connecticut, a hardline Democrat district, is forced to be subjected to a revote in their Democrat primary because of election rigging. [1] The decision came as footage of people stuffing ballot boxes provided irrefutable evidence of something fowl going on.
The judge who issued the recount, Judge William Clark, not only ruled to issue a recount, but also ruled that a new general election would be on the table if needed. [2] The judge also implemented additional election safeguards such as forcing the Bridgeport town clerk to stamp every drop-box ballot for identification as such.
Two of the alleged election rigging conspirators were summoned to explain their actions, but rather than provide an explanation, they pleaded the fifth.
side note: there was a concerted effort to rig the 2020 election. The media, Big Tech, and Democrat Party conspired to get Trump out of office, and they changed state laws in violation of state constitutions to do it. The evidence is laid bare for all to see in Rigged by Mollie Hemingway. In her book she lays out the case, in timeline form, showing, with 85 pages of references to back up her claims, that the election was rigged.
What really sticks out to me here is how the same, exact evidence exists for election rigging of the 2020 Presidential Election, yet no revote was ever issued. Apparently it is perfectly fine to distrust democracy when a mayoral primary is on the line, but not when the most important election of our country occurs.
To those of you wondering, there is plenty of surveillance video tapes of alleged electioneers doing the same thing during the 2020 election, such as in Detroit [3] and Georgia [4]. Election officials and the media, of course, used loaded language and appeals to authority to attempt to discredit publicly available video evidence, but nonetheless.
Why was it perfectly fine to dismiss those instances, but in this instance a full-scale revote, not recount, but a complete revote, is in order? What’s the difference? What am I missing here?
There are even witnesses who state, point blank, that they have witnessed election fraud themselves. [5] [6] [7] This isn’t just in isolated instances, either. They are people from multiple states.
But you know what was strangely absent from this Democrat ballot stuffing case? No appeals to authority where election officials are infallible arbiters of truth and justice. No rhetoric saying the opposition is “attempting to overturn the results of the election” or “spreading conspiracy theories” or wielding “disinformation” against the “democratic process.” I wonder why that is?
Could it be that it is because, deep down, Democrats and legacy media outlets know that bringing forth video evidence and witness statements is truly enough to question the integrity of an election?
Could it be that, when your candidate is likely guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors, it seems highly plausible that rigging an election is just par for the course?
After all, for a “dictator” who was “overturning the results of the election,” Trump sure had a funny way of showing it. He didn’t use the DOJ to sue the opposition, like Biden is doing. He didn’t weaponize the FBI to search and spy on his political opponents like Biden has and Obama did. All he did was file lawsuits. That’s not dictatorial; that is what you do in democracies. You attempt to get justice.
And, when the results were certified, Trump didn’t instigate a coup. He didn’t declare martial law and throw out the results of the election. He peacefully transitioned power to Biden. The way our “democracy” has always worked.
But when a Democrat mayoral candidate allegedly has ballot boxes stuffed on video, just like how people in the 2020 general election did, not only do we throw out the whole primary election, we even put the possibility of throwing out the general election on the table, too. Very odd indeed that nobody is stating the obvious. If ballot stuffing on video is good enough evidence for a city-wide primary revote, it is for sure good enough evidence for a Presidential reelection.
SOURCES:
[1] https://san.com/cc/connecticut-ballot-stuffing-scandal-prompts-a-mayoral-election-revote/
[3]
[4]
[5]
*This post may contain affiliate links.